Zwuckel
Level 2 Valued Member
I wondered if do only strength blocks for a few years with let´s say low calories do I make it harder or maybe even impossible to gain muscle mass?
For example I´ll do the Strong! strength block back on back on back for a few years. Now I´m incredibly strong and can C&P 40k +. I still look skinny because I haven´t eaten much.
As far as my understanding goes for hypertrophy I have to increase reps and maybe decrease pause times. Because of my strength I start out with the 32k maybe. From there on I assume it will be incredibly difficult to increase the weight because it it already so heavy and more taxing compared to 20k. Therefore making muscle gains very difficult or maybe even impossible.
I have the feeling I´m missing something. Can someone explain?
Foot note: I read the newsletter from Tuesday. I mean sarcoplasma and glycogen. It was the first time I heard about increase in contractile protein. So that may fall under different rules?
For example I´ll do the Strong! strength block back on back on back for a few years. Now I´m incredibly strong and can C&P 40k +. I still look skinny because I haven´t eaten much.
As far as my understanding goes for hypertrophy I have to increase reps and maybe decrease pause times. Because of my strength I start out with the 32k maybe. From there on I assume it will be incredibly difficult to increase the weight because it it already so heavy and more taxing compared to 20k. Therefore making muscle gains very difficult or maybe even impossible.
I have the feeling I´m missing something. Can someone explain?
Foot note: I read the newsletter from Tuesday. I mean sarcoplasma and glycogen. It was the first time I heard about increase in contractile protein. So that may fall under different rules?